chloelogoa

                    von Willebrand's Disease (vWD)                   

talalogoa

von Willebrand's Disease (vWD) is an inherited condition that may result in an animal to bleed. This bleeding may be of a varying tendency and severity between affected individuals. In dogs it may be an acquired condition associated with an underlying disease, but is most commonly seen as an inherited condition. Acquired forms of the disease are often susceptible to treatment of the underlying disease, the concentration of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) returning to normal in many cases.


For those animals with the inherited condition there is no possibility of a cure. When aware of a decrease in vWF concentration, informed breeders, owners and their veterinarians can be aware of the possibility of complications due to accident, injury and/or surgery and propagation of this trait can be reduced or eliminated by informed breeding decisions.

von Willebrand's Disease results in a reduced quantity and/or function of von Willebrand's factor (vWF), a glycoprotein necessary for normal platelet function in the initial phase of haemostasis (blood clotting). It is caused by the inheritance of mutated genes that code for the production of von Willebrand Factor, these mutated genes are also referred to as the von Willebrand's Disease genes. von Willebrand's Disease is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. This means an animal (male or female) with two mutated vWF genes will be affected with the disease. An animal who has inherited 1 mutated gene will be a carrier of von Willebrand's Disease. If 2 carrier animals are mated, there is a probability that half of the resulting offspring will be carriers, 25% will be affected with the disease, and 25% will be normal. There is variable expression of the vWF trait, so some affected animals may bleed severely while other affected animals may hardly show any bleeding at all. Therefore, we can not reliably predict which dogs with low plasma vWF concentrations will show impairment of haemostasis.

Breeds of dogs with a high prevalence of the vWD gene (15-80%) include the Basset Hound; standard and miniature Dachshund; Doberman Pinscher; German Shepherd; Golden Retriever; Keeshond; standard and toy Manchester Terrier; miniature Schnauzer; Pembroke Welsh Corgi; miniature and standard Poodle; Rottweiler; Scottish Terrier and Shetland Sheepdog.  Von Willebrand’s Disease has been documented in other breeds and/or cross bred dogs, but the prevalence of the vWD gene is lower than 15% or insufficient data has been accumulated in order to determine prevalence.

Clinical signs of bleeding that are typical of the decrease in platelet function seen with vWD include bleeding from the gums, urinary system, epistaxis (nose bleed) and/or gastrointestinal bleeding, with or without diarrhoea.  Petechiae (small haemorrhages) on the gums or any mucosal surfaces may be apparent. Animals with vWD may be prone to prolonged bleeding at any site of injury, trauma or surgery.  Haemorrhage into body cavities, joints or large extravasations are more suggestive of other coagulation factor deficiencies, but do not rule out the presence of vWD.

Not all animals with decreased levels of vWF exhibit increased tendency to bleed.  Obtaining a buccal mucosal bleeding time may be of benefit in determining if an individual with decreased vWF concentration is likely to exhibit clinical signs of bleeding, with or without trauma.  Buccal mucosal bleeding time may be used to help formulate classification and recommendations for breeding (See Interpretation section).   Surgicutt buccal mucosal bleeding time devices are available from Diagnostic Laboratory Services at the cost of £10.00.  Instructions and expected bleeding times are supplied with the device.

Method of Testing
Animal Health Trust refers samples to Cornell University, New York for testing by the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method for vWF determination in blood plasma. It compares patient vWF antigen concentration to that of a known canine standard.

Animal Health Trust offers a genetic test for von Willebrand’s disease, which carried out at our Newmarket site.  This test is only available for Irish Red & White Setters.  For more information contact our Canine Genetics Group on 08700 509144, or visit the AHT website: www.aht.org.uk.

In healthy animals the vWF concentration may be used to predict genetic status with regard to vWD.  Heterozygous carriers of vWD usually are identified as having less than half the normal concentration of plasma vWF.  The homozygous condition results in production of little or no vWF protein.

There is a borderline level of vWF concentration (50-69%) at which accurate prediction of vWD status is not possible. It may be the result of normal genotype or heterozygous carrier of the vWD gene. Retesting and/or breeding only to higher testing mates is recommended and puppies should be checked.

The rate of misclassification of genetic status by the ELISA test has been reported to be less than 5%.  However, misclassification of genotype by false positive or false negative result is always possible.  Retesting of an additional, freshly drawn sample is recommended in any animal with a result suspected of being falsely positive or negative.  In addition, analysis of samples from the parents of progeny affected with vWD is recommended, regardless of their previous status - they may have been misclassified as free from vWD.  Review of sample collection, handling and testing conditions, as well as animal condition, possible health problems and recent medications also should be considered.

Ageing of Samples
Ageing of the sample may affect vWF levels, as may repeat freezing and thawing.Our studies of sample ageing at room temperature over
1 - 12 days indicate a decline in vWF concentration of up to 37%.  Decreases of up to 18% may occur with only 2 days at room temperature with progressive, but smaller decreases occurring up to 7 days.  After 7 days there appears to be more variation in levels with possible plateau effect.
Studies of sample stability while frozen at -20oC for 1 week indicate no significant decrease in vWF concentration during this time.This is important since thawing of plasma samples during prolonged transport may cause decreases that would change the interpretation of the test results.

 
Indications for Testing
The vWF test is indicated in dogs in the following circumstances:

Prior to breeding.
Animals known to be at risk for vWD based on breed, clinical signs and/or history should be tested. In a healthy animal, vWF concentration may be used to predict genetic status.

In conjunction with other tests in animals with clinical signs of bleeding, conditions that may predispose to acquired vWD or other causes of bleeding.
 
Conditions Contraindicating Submission of Samples for vWF Screening
The concentration von Willebrand Factor may be influenced by a variety of hormones, medications and inflammatory conditions.  This may result in unpredictable fluctuations of vWF concentrations.  Samples for vWF testing should not be collected if the following apply.

Vaccination, medication (including steroids) or resolution of systemic illness within the last 2 weeks.

Recent blood transfusion, within the last week.

Recent surgery, as vWF may participate as an acute-phase reactant protein and increase with inflammation or stress. This test should be scheduled prior to surgery if there is concern about increased risk associated with breed, clinical signs or history.

Pregnancy, oestrus (heat) or lactation.  An anoestrus sample is recommended for female dogs.

Suspected endocrine disease that has not been evaluated.

 Hypothyroidism may aggravate decreases in vWF.  Other endocrine conditions may influence vWF concentrations. Concurrent evaluations of endocrine and vWF status may be of benefit in some individuals, based on clinical signs, presentation and history.

We also recommend that puppies are tested at least 2 weeks after their ‘last’ vaccination.

Sample Collection & Handling
Careful collection and handling are critical in obtaining an accurate result.  With improper sample collection there may be early activation of haemostasis prior to the visual detection of a clot, which tends to produce falsely low vWF concentration results.

Sodium citrate is the only suitable anti-coagulant for von Willebrand Factor testing.
Use only plastic syringes and tubes, as glass tends to cause activation of haemostasis resulting in the formation of a clot.The correct ratio of citrate anticoagulant (3.8% Tri-sodium citrate) to blood is important, so the tube(s) should not be under or over-filled.

Usually collection of a minimum volume of 2.0 ml of blood is requested to ensure that an adequate volume of plasma is obtained.

Remove the needle from the syringe and gently expel blood down the side of a plastic sodium citrate tube. Do not squirt blood through the needle as this may result in the destruction of red blood cells.

The sample must be mixed gently but thoroughly immediately after collection, to prevent activation of haemostasis, that may cause a falsely low of von Willebrand Factor result.

If a clot is present, the sample is not suitable for submission and should be recollected.

Prompt centrifugation and separation of plasma from the blood cells is requested if possible. Since prolonged contact of cells and plasma may result in haemolysis, or transcellular shifts of constituents that may interfere with the testing or reduce the volume of plasma available for harvesting.

If your sodium citrate sample tube will not fit into your centrifuge, transfer the blood to an appropriately sized, clean, plain plastic tube (no anti-coagulant) for centrifugation. The sample should be centrifuged at 2000-3000 rpm for 10 minutes or using the settings that you usually use to separate blood in your centrifuge.

If excessive haemolysis is present, in the plasma after centrifugation the sample may not be suitable for testing and recollection is advised.

Carefully pipette plasma, taking care that erythrocytes are not aspirated. Use a plastic pipette and transfer plasma to a clean, plain, plastic tube that does not contain anticoagulant.

Please label the tube with the animal and owner name, date and contents (citrated plasma).

For the von Willebrand Factor Antigen test we recommend that the plasma be frozen. Samples kept at room temperature have been shown to give lower results compared to samples that have been stored refrigerated or frozen.

We recommend that the sample is sent to the laboratory by as soon as possible, i.e. overnight delivery (by special delivery post or courier). Ice packs should be included with the sample packaging for vWF testing to ensure that the sample remains cold.

Please do not send samples on Friday since the weekend may delay delivery. In this case keep the sample frozen and post on Monday.

When samples are received for von Willebrand Factor testing, they are stored frozen until the next test.   Samples are sent to Cornell University, USA by courier every other Wednesday with results available by Monday morning.
 
References
Avgeris, S., Lothrop, CD JR., McDonald, TP. Plasma von Willebrand Factor Concentration and Thyroid Function in Dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 196: 921-924, 1990.
Benson, RE, Catalfamo, JL, Dodds, WJ. A Multispecies Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for von Willebrand Factor. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1119: 420-427, 1992.
Brooks, M., Dodds, WJ, Raymond, SL. Epidemiologic Features of von Willebrand’sDisease in Doberman Pinschers, Scottish Terriers and Shetland Sheepdogs, 260 cases(1984-1988). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 200: 1123-1127, 1992.
Dodds, J.W. Bleeding Disorders. In: Handbook of Small Animal Practice. 2nd ed. Morgan,R.V. (ed.), Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York, N.Y., 1988, pp. 773 -786, 1992, pp. 765-777.
Dodds, W.J. Contributions and Future Directions of Hemostasis Research. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 193: 1157-1160, 1988.
Dodds, W.J.  Bleeding and Immune Diseases, Parts I and II, and Acquired von Willebrand’s Disease. Proc. 56th Meeting, American Animal Hospital Association, St. Louis, MO, 1989, pp. 606-619.
Dodds, WJ. Hemostasis. In: Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 5th ed. Kaneko, JJ, Harvey, JW and Bruss, ML (eds). Academic Press, London, 1997, pp. 241-283.
Johnson, GS, Turrentine, MA, Draus, KH. Canine von Willebrand’s Disease: a Heterogenous Group of Bleeding Disorders. Vet. Clin. North Am. 18: 195-229, 1988.
Green, RA and Thomas, JS. Hemostatic Disorders: Coagulopathies and Thrombosis. In: Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Ettinger, SJ and Feldman, EC (eds). W.B. Saunders Company, London, 1995, pp. 1952.
Reagan, WJ and Rebar, AH. Platelet Disorders. In: Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Ettinger, SJ and Feldman, EC (eds). W.B. Saunders Company, London, 1995, pp. 1973-1974.

 
VON WILLEBRAND'S FACTOR TESTING BY ELISA

Interpretation of Results

This test is used to screen animals for the presence of von Willebrand’s disease (vWD) and can be used as a tool for prediction of genetic status in healthy animals used for breeding. The Reference Interval for dogs is 70-180%.  This means that individuals without vWD are expected to exhibit von Willebrand’s Factor (vWF) concentrations that vary from 70-180% of that of a standard control.


Patient Result for vWF
> 180% Interpretation with regard to vWD genetic status not possible.  May reflect stress, improper sample collection or handling or activation from concurrent disease.  Retesting recommended
80-180% Within normal limits. Does not support the presence of vWD gene.
70-79%  At the lower end of normal range. Does not support the presence of vWD, but caution advised for breeding. Mating to individuals with higher levels is recommended and puppies should be checked.
50-69% Borderline result. May be the result of normal status or heterozygous carrier of vWD gene. Recommend retesting and/or breeding only to higher testing mates and checking puppies.
1-50%
   
  Consistent with heterozygous carrier of vWD gene. If no evidence of bleeding clinically and buccal mucosal bleeding time results are within normal limits, breeding only to higher testing mates is recommended and puppies should be checked. If clinically signs are present and/or buccal mucosal bleeding time is abnormal, animal should not be used for breeding.
< 1% Consistent with homozygous status for vWD gene. This animal is the likely the progeny of 2 asymptomatic, heterozygous carrier parents and should not be used for breeding.

*****************************

DNA Studies in Doberman von Willebrand's Disease.

The Mutation Discovered and a DNA Test Developed

by George J. Brewer, Professor,
Department of Human Genetics and Internal Medicine,
University of Michigan Medical School, Co-Founder of VetGen LLC


Our research team is very excited about our discovery of the mutation that causes von Willebrand's disease (vWD) in the Doberman Pinscher. Credit for the discovery must include my colleagues, Dr.'s Patrick Venta, Vilma Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, and William Schall, of the College of Veterinary Medicine at Michigan State University, and to Dr. Jianping Li, who works in my laboratory at the University of Michigan as well as at VetGen LLC, and who did all the DNA sequencing. This discovery is a nice example of the productive co-operation between the two universities and the company mentioned, as well as four funding organizations that provided support, The Doberman Pinscher Foundation of America, Inc., The Orthopaedic Foundation for Animals, the Morris Animal Foundation, and the American Kennel Club.

The mutation itself has some interesting aspects. For one thing, precisely the same mutation has occurred in some human patients with vWD. It is a little unusual to see mutations be identical across species. This shows how closely we are related to our canine brethren! Second, the mutation is of a type such that completely normal von Willebrand's factor (vWF) is made about 5-10% of the time. Technically, the mutation is called a splice site mutation, with alternative splicing occurring about 90-95% of the time. That jargon won't mean much to the average Doberman breeder or owner, but let me explain what is happening in lay person language. It may be useful for the Doberman fancy to understand the mutation to a certain extent, because its nature explains why it was so confusing to understand for a long time, and it also explains why affected Dobermans have a milder disease than, say, affected Scotties.

To try to understand the effects of this mutation, let's use an analogy common to general experience. Imagine that a freight train is supposed to go from point A to point B following a railroad track. There is a point where a side track goes to point C. However, normally the train never goes to point C, because the switch to point C, connecting the track up to the main track, is never thrown. Then the switch breaks (this is the mutation) such that the lock holding the switch from connecting the track to point C is no longer effective. The switch can now jiggle back and forth, sending some trains to point B, and others to point C. As freight trains rumble towards the switch, 95% of the time it jiggles over and causes the train to end up at point C. This is useless because point C ends at a cliff. The trains rumble over the cliff and are never heard from again. A minority of the time, maybe about 5%, the switch jiggles the other way and the trains end up at their normal destination. So, only 5% of the freight is delivered.

This is exactly what happens in the Doberman affected animal. These animals have two doses (two trains in the above example) of the mutated gene. Each gene is capable of making 5-10% of normal vWF (that is, going down the main track to point B), because the normal splice site is used a little. The 90-95% of the time the mutated splice site is used (going down the side track to point C), no useful vWF is produced. Since each of the two mutated genes is producing 5-10% of normal vWF the affected Doberman ends up with twice that, or 10-20% of normal vWF in their blood.

So, one of the mysteries of Doberman vWD that has puzzled scientists for years, how affected dogs can end up with a small amount of completely normal vWF, is cleared up by understanding this type of mutation. A second mystery is also cleared up. Doberman owners and breeders have had their dogs tested for vWF for years using the protein assay of vWF, and have often discovered low values in dogs without a bleeding history, even at surgery. The reason is, such dogs have 10-20% of normal vWF. If the bleeding stress isn't too great, the 10-20% of normal vWF that is present can prevent undue bleeding. Part of the time uneventful surgery fits that criterion, and unusual bleeding does not occur.

I hasten to add that this should not be taken to mean that vWD in the Doberman is clinically harmless. The literature is full of reports of Doberman's bleeding and dying from vWD. There are a number of factors, known and unknown, which will affect the clinical outcome in a given case. First coagulation factors, such as vWF, are consumed during blood clotting. The more the bleeding, from injury or surgery, the more the consumption, and the more likely the limited supply of vWF in an affected Doberman will be used up, leading to renewed bleeding, now from vWF deficiency. Second there is also variation in the amount of vWF in affected Dobermans. A dog with a 5% value is at greater risk than one with 15%. Of course, other factors, such as other coagulation and tissue factors that we aren't measuring, will certainly vary from one affected dog to another, and change the risk of bleeding up or down in a given situation.

The Doberman breeder and owner should view vWD as a significant health risk, and a fault, and strive to get rid of the mutated gene. The discovery of the mutation, and the recent development of a DNA test, now provides just that opportunity.

Another mystery about Doberman vWD that we now understand better is the actual frequency of vWD in Dobermans. Dobermans have been said to have a 70% plus frequency of this disease, but that is not correct. It's more on the order of 35% affected, with an additional large group being carriers, but free of any bleeding risk. The disease is an "autosomal recessive", which means that affected animals have two doses of the mutated gene, and a mild to moderate risk of bleeding, for reasons explained earlier. Based on very preliminary data, we believe the mutant gene has a frequency of about 0.6 (60% of the genes are mutant) which translates into about 36% of all Dobermans being homozygous affected (two doses of the abnormal gene and at risk for bleeding), 48% being carriers (one abnormal and one normal gene, no risk of bleeding), and 16% being homozygous clear (two doses of the normal gene). If the gene frequency turns out to be closer to 0.5, the frequencies for affected will be 25%, carriers 50%, and clear 25%. Of course, our small sample comes from a limited region of the country. The gene frequencies may vary some in different parts of the country, but the bottom line will remain the same. This is a very common disease and a very common mutant gene.
Carriers of the mutant vWD gene are at no risk of bleeding from vWD, but of course, will transmit the mutant gene to their offspring 50% of the time. Roughly, the ranges of vWF factor levels are 5 to 20% for affected, 30-100% for carriers, and 50-130% for homozygous normal. Note the major overlap between carriers and normals for vWF levels. This overlap accounts for the extreme unreliability of the vWF assay in trying to identify Doberman carriers of vWD.

The new DNA test for Doberman vWD is offered by VetGen LLC (3728 Plaza Drive, Suite 1, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108; (734) 669-8440, (800) 4-VETGEN; Fax (734) 669-8441). It is very easy to do the test. You can order the test kit from VetGen by phone or letter. Each test kit costs $5 and contains three soft brushes and instructions. Following the instructions, the dog owner brushes the inside of the dog's mouth. Some of the cells lining the inside of the mouth stick to the brush, and provide the DNA for the test. No blood is required. The brushes are replaced in their envelope and mailed back to VetGen. Each vWD DNA test costs $135. VetGen will supply test results within two weeks of receiving the DNA.
Test results will come back as "clear," "carrier," or "affected." As stated earlier, clear means both vWF genes are normal, carrier means one is normal and one is defective, and affected means both genes are defective. It is important to realize that this DNA test is very different from the old protein based factor assay. The DNA test is definitive and final, a lifelong, permanent determination of the vWD status of each dog tested as contrasted to the factor assay, in which the levels could change drastically over time. We can now say in hindsight that the old test probably correctly identified some affected Dobermans (values under 20), but it is completely unreliable for carrier detection.

What should a breeder do with the test results, once they are obtained, in terms of breeding decisions? The problem facing the Doberman breeder is that it appears that only 15 to 20% of Dobermans are clear of the vWD gene. If one breeds mostly clear to clear, it narrows the breeding pool so much that there is risk of losing some of the Doberman's genetic heritage, i.e., some of the genes determining valuable positive characteristics of the Doberman might be lost, or highly diluted. Therefore, as a first priority, we advise breeding clear to clear and clear to carrier, at least for the next two or three generations. Over time, as the frequency of clear dog’s increases, it should be possible to breed mostly clear to clear, and to eventually eliminate the mutant vWD gene.

As a second priority, we suggest that it is reasonable to breed carrier to carrier, if an acceptable clear dog is not available for breeding. This type of mating will produce 25% clear, 50% carrier, and 25% affected, on average. The puppies should be tested and the affected puppies not used for breeding.

Breeding carrier to affected and affected to affected should be avoided if at all possible. The first breeding produces 50% affected on average, and the second produces 100% affected animals. In my opinion, there should be two initial objectives of the Doberman vWD breeding program. One objective should be to produce as few affected animals as possible, because each is a health risk. That doesn't mean we believe affected Doberman puppies should be put down. Most of them can live normal lives. If possible, we believe it would be a good idea to neuter affected animals. The second objective of the breeding program should be to gradually reduce the gene and disease frequency. The kinds of breedings involving the mating of an affected, as listed at the first of this paragraph, tend to increase the disease gene frequency, whereas clear to clear and clear to carrier breedings tend to decrease frequency. Click here for further information on Breeding Strategies.

To further raise the awareness and standards of Doberman breeders, VetGen is helping the Orthopaedic Foundation for Animals (OFA) establish a vWD registry for Dobermans. By registering the results of the vWD DNA test on their dogs, breeders stand to benefit at the point of sale when selling either carrier or clear puppies as established by the vWD DNA test.

In summary, Doberman pinscher breeders are now in the advantageous position of being able to begin eliminating one of the significant diseases in their breed, because of the discovery of the mutation producing vWD in this breed, and the development of a vWD DNA test by VetGen. The test is remarkably easy to get done, and is reasonably priced, considering that it is a definitive lifetime determiner of the vWD genetic type of the dog tested. We urge Doberman breeders to get their breeding stock tested, so that we can get on with eliminating this disease.

For further information, or to order test kits, contact VetGen at:
3728 Plaza Drive, Suite 1, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108
800-4-VETGEN (800-483-8436) / fax 734-669-8441

back to top

chloebutton     talabutton