![]() |
How Do Dogs
See
|
![]() |
| What
Humans See |
![]() |
![]() |
| What
Dogs see |
| “Although
the tapetum improves vision in dim light, it also scatters some light,
degrading the dog’s vision from the 20:20 that you and I normally see
to about 20:80,” Paul E Miller DVM. (Journal of the Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA, vol. 207, no. 12, pp. 1623-1634, Dec. 15, 1995). |
| Acuity
is the ability to focus so that two objects appear as distinct
entities.) This is the value that is measured in people using an eye
chart. In animals (and in infants) this can be measured using
retinoscopy. Visual acuity in normal dogs has been estimated to be
20-40% that of humans. This means that, at 20 feet, a dog can
distinguish an object that a human could see at 90 feet. Acuity is a
function of the clarity of the structures of the eye (cornea, aqueous
humor, lens, and vitreous) as well as the combined refractive powers to
focus the image clearly on the retina. One of the most common diseases
which can affect the clarity of the eye is formation of a cataract
within the lens. Cataracts in dogs are most often inherited and may
affect dogs at any age. As the lens becomes progressively opaque, an
animal's vision deteriorates so that only light and dark perception
exists. Surprisingly, animals function relatively well in familiar
surroundings, even with severe vision impairment. This illustrates the
ability of dogs and cats to depend heavily on their other senses,
namely smell and hearing. http://www.veterinaryvision.com/See.htm |
| Visual
acuity is the ability to see the details of an object separately and
clearly. Visual acuity depends on three factors: a) optical properties
of the eye, b)retinal detection and processing of the image, and c)
proper interpretation of the images by higher centers in the brain.
Postretinal processing has not been extensively studied in dogs, and
was beyond the scope of the article being reviewed. Optical factors in visual acuity: The optical media of the eye consists of the cornea, aqueous humor, lens, and vitreous humor. These structures are responsible for creating a properly focused image on the retina (emmetropia). If the image is focused in front of the retina, myopia, or nearsightedness, results, and if the image is focused behind the retina, hyperopia, or farsightedness, results. Some dogs are myopic, or nearsighted. One study demonstrated that 53% of a group of German Shepherds were myopic, and another study indicated that 64% of a group of Rottweilers were myopic. However, another study of a group of guide dog German Shepherds found only 15% of this group of dogs were myopic, indicating that selection for normal vision may have occurred. Myopic dogs may have been removed from the program due to poorer performance, without an understanding of why they were performing poorly. This finding may have important implications for retriever breeds, indicating that poor marking skills may possibly be related to vision disturbances, and use of animals with poor marking skills in breeding programs may possibly propagate those vision problems. Other optical aberrations may occur within the eye, creating vision problems, such as astigmatism, spherical aberrations of the lens, and chromatic aberrations. The clinical importance of these conditions is unclear in dogs - they are either an uncommon finding or the canine eye may be able to accommodate for these problems. In addition, the normal eye is able to accommodate, or change focus, which allows normal vision of objects at different distances. The canine eye has limited accommodative ability compared to the human eye. They appear to be only able to accurately image objects within 50 to 33 cm of their eye, where as human children are able to accurately image objects as close as 7 cm. Dogs compensate for this limited accommodative ability by using other senses, such as smell or taste, to augment vision of very close objects. As humans age, it is normal to lose some accommodating ability (age-related presbyopia), and it is thought that dogs also undergo similar age related changes in accommodation, but the incidence or significance has not be studied in dogs. Retinal factors in visual acuity: It is felt that the retina is the principle limiting factor of visual acuity in dogs. To improve vision in dim light, a greater number of photoreceptors converge on a single ganglion cell (a nerve cell that gathers input from receptor cells and then transmits the information to higher nervous centers in the brain). The more photoreceptors converging on a single ganglion cell, the less detail is present in the image produced, just as high speed photographic film, designed for low light situations, produces a grainier image than lower speed (brighter light) photographic film. The more ganglion cells present, the more nerve fibers present in the optic nerve that relays visual information to the brain. The canine optic nerve contains approximately 167,000 nerve fibers, compared with the human optic nerve which contains 1.2 million nerve fibers. In the human eye, there is a circular area of the retina that contains the densest concentration of photoreceptors and ganglion cells, called the fovea. It is centrally located, and is the area of the retina that produces the sharpest image. The canine eye lacks a fovea, but rather has a region termed the visual streak. The visual streak is an oval area of the retina located just above the optic nerve, and is positioned with its long axis on a horizontal plane, and is centered on the area of the retina closer to the nose. Like the fovea, it contains the highest concentration of photoreceptors and ganglion cells, and is the area that produces the greatest visual acuity. It is located in the tapetal area of the retina, which again aids in enhancing vision in dim light. The oval shape of the visual streak probably helps improve a dog's ability to scan the horizon, and the nasal location of the visual streak probably enhances a dog's ability to use peripheral vision. Individual variations in the density of ganglion cells within the visual streak have been noted. Wolves have a higher density of ganglion cells than dogs (12,000 to 14,000 ganglion cells/mm2 in wolves compared to 6,400 to 14,400 ganglion cells/mm2 in dogs) which suggests that wolves have better visual acuity than dogs. Differences are found between dogs, also, and this may be another area where selection for visual ability may occur. One study indicated that one strain of Beagles had a pronounced visual streak, whereas another strain had only a moderately pronounced streak. It is possible, although difficult, to differentiate between pronounced and moderate visual streaks with ophthalmoscopic evaluation, and this may potentially be a tool that could be used in selection of breeding stock. Careful evaluation of the retina by a competent ophthalmologist, using sophisticated equipment, is required to make this differentiation. Studies to validate the effectiveness of this technique are required before this technique can be recommended in breeding stock selection. Estimates of visual acuity: The most commonly used indicator of visual acuity is the Snellen fraction, which relates the ability to distinguish objects or letters at a fixed distance with the standard response. Snellen fractions of 20/20, 20/40, 20/60 or 20/100 indicates that the test subject needs to be 20 feet away from an image to clearly visualize the details that a normal subject could discern at 20, 40, 60, and 100 feet away, respectively. A variety of studies have been done, using a number of different methodologies, to estimate the visual acuity of dogs. We can assume from these studies that the normal dog has a visual acuity of approximately 20/75. This means that a dog must be 20 feet away from an object to clearly visualize details of that object that a human with normal vision could clearly visualize from a distance of 75 feet. Again, this less acute vision in dogs is a trade-off for improved vision in dim light, and their life style does not require visual distinction of fine details as does our life style. "Vision in dogs", was written by Paul E. Miller, DVM and Christopher J. Murphy, DVM, and published in the Journal of the Veterinary Medical Association (JAVMA, vol. 207, no. 12, pp. 1623-1634, Dec. 15, 1995). http://psychlops.psy.uconn.edu/eric/class/dogvision.html |