email Pet Nutritionist:
darleen@purelypets.com with questions
about your pet or our products.
Copyright © 1997~2007 Purely Pets. All rights reserved.
reprinted with kind permission from Darleen Rudnick
********************
As humans, we
strive for more than just freedom from physical limitations, pain, or
disease; we seek Wellness, within ourselves and all of that around us.
True Wellness is a state of life in which the totality of genetic expression
is a living reality. This natural state is the birthright of all life
on earth. Nurtured from within and supported from outside the confines
of the physical body, life is viewed as a full and rich tapestry on many
levels. The absence of disease is a by-product of this natural state.
Why is the health and longevity
of a pet so important?
In our fast-paced world
of technology and commerce, we can lose touch with our more nature-oriented
aspects and the natural environment around us. Few links to this natural
world remain. The very fortunate few of us with gardens that bear fruit
still can experience a link to a less technological time. The only way
greater numbers of us who live in concrete, urban environments can still
share in a joy experienced by all cultures of humankind since the dawn
of history is through the bonding with a companion animal. These pets allow
us to go beyond the constraints of our own immediate human situation and
into a larger, older, more harmonious world-view. The very act of nurturing
and caring for these four-legged friends and, in return receiving their
unconditional devotion, brings us closer to our natural roots in this world
and allows us to experience our humanity from a place of greater emotional
well-being.
Why do we believe holistic
approaches to animal care are so important?
Since these methods address
the whole organism and support the body’s own abilities to heal itself,
many holistic methods focus on prevention and cure of disease, not just treatment.
Proper nutrition is the foundation upon which many holistic practices build
our pet's (and our own) quality of life and Wellness. Poor nutrition is
one of the major contributors to our pet's lower life expectancy. By feeding
our pets most commercially available pet foods, we are unintentionally depriving
these animals of important nutrients needed for sustaining the states
of greater Wellness that their genetic material encodes.
Western medical science
views our bodies as “bio-mechanical parts” that can either be repaired
or replaced. Non-holistic medical and veterinary practitioners address
illness in the same way; a disease means a body part is malfunctioning or
has been “invaded” by some outside agent. One either repairs or removes
that body part through surgery, or supports it with chemicals or substances
from the outside. Identifying a malfunctioning part often requires expensive
laboratory testing; a major part of most physical examinations. Laboratory
workups support medical diagnoses with “scientific fact”; which in turn
confirms the malfunctioning body parts and outside agents. This is the non-holistic
medical model of disease.
Growing numbers of people,
though, are seeking alternatives to this medical model. They want more
encompassing methods not just for themselves but also for their companion
animals. Instead of viewing a living body as a flesh-covered skeleton
composed of individual “bio- mechanical parts”, holistic methods approach
living organisms as constellations of “biological” systems; each self-contained
and self-defined, yet all seamlessly woven into an organic tapestry that
is constantly unfolding over time through the expression of “Universal
Being”. More inclusive forms of treatment address the whole organism; not
just the sum of the organic parts. Holistic treatments do not isolate,
control, or eliminate individual symptoms; they assist the whole body in
regaining “Wellness” and a higher state of balance.
Few people suggest that
holistic approaches should totally replace medical and veterinary science
especially in the case of accident or acute illness. However, many alternative
methods achieve significant results without the need for surgical intervention
or long-term drug therapy.
As lovers of companion
animals, we want to take an active role in the care of our pets. We must
assume responsibility for their quality of life and their “Wellness.”
Statistics show that the average life expectancies of companion animals
have rapidly dropped in the last 40 years despite improvements in the medical
model, veterinary diagnosis, and treatment modalities. Poor nutrition, inbred
genetic defects, and over-vaccination have led to an epidemic of allergic
reactions that challenge our pets’ bodily defenses. Their shortened lives
are further complicated by symptoms ranging from skin rashes to epilepsy,
kidney and liver ailments as well as other chronic disease processes. Our
pets have grown hypersensitive to many common environmental allergens their
ancestors casually threw off.
Our companion animals provide
us with an important reminder of our link to this totality. The closeness
we feel toward our animal friends reinforces our view of them as full family
members and life companions. We see ourselves in them and are reminded
of our greater nature. Our companion animals live in a natural state of
oneness no matter what “illness” they may have. In their reflection of
a natural earthly rhythm, we are reminded intellectually and emotionally
that all is well in life’s ever diversifying flow.
Our gain from their unconditional
acceptance of us is transformed into our wanting Wellness for them and
ourselves.
email Pet Nutritionist:
darleen@purelypets.com
with questions about your pet or our products.
Copyright © 1997~2007 Purely Pets. All rights reserved.
reprinted with kind permission from Darleen Rudnick
****************************
|
Concerns About Commercial
Pet Food
by William Pollak, DVM
|
What are you
really feeding your pet?
What we’d like
to speak on is the importance of freshness, wholesomeness, and the appropriateness
of what is consumed.
The information we provide is for those people seeking powerful yet
simple suggestions for enhancing Wellness in their companion animals, as
well as their own lives. Not all seekers are looking for this enhanced
Wellness. Most people in fact are satisfied with their dog or cat “looking”
normal on the current commercial food; they assume the animal is just fine.
It is not our wish to tell them otherwise. A developing sense of and desire
for greater Wellness is growing in the world and is giving rise to this information.
It is our hope that this small change, switching your pet to a natural
raw meat diet, will enhance the quality of life of not just your pet, but
your entire household. We have seen this time and time again.
Some concerns about Commercial Pet Food:
Pet labels mislead and distort nutritional facts.
Some animal by-products make regularly consumed pet food poisonous
and toxic.
Food additives, like coloring, are for the human purchaser,
not the animal consumer.
Product deficiencies lead to overeating, the buying of more
products, and the creation of greater malnutrition.
Our companion animals’ life expectancies are growing shorter
every generation.
Chronic allergic reactions are primarily food based; cause
suffering; and require additional treatments that often exacerbates underlying
disease.
Nutritional issues receive little publicity because the subject
matter is technical and usually leads to the “naming of names”. Pet food
advertising revenue is huge and consequently, the advertisers are very
powerful. Common editorial policy must balance “news-worthiness” with business;
this usually results in avoiding negative references to advertisers’ products.
This situation is neither political nor, by contemporary standards,
even sensational. It is however, something we deal with everyday. It is
lack of information. Food manufacturers are silent; they sell pet food in
a highly competitive market at prices that haven’t changed in many years.
Have you ever asked yourself, why not? The raw materials these food manufacturers
mix together to produce typical pet foods you find along the supermarket
aisles come from highly questionable, and in some cases, unbelievable sources
unfit for either person or beast. Compounding this situation is the fact
that pet food labels give only vague ideas of a pet food’s content. The listed
items are essentially “catch-all terms” for more specific, and often less
desirable, substances. Protein, fat, carbohydrate, and crude fiber are general
food categories; they have no functional meaning in terms of nutritional
source, quality, or digestibility.
Our biggest concern as consumers of commercially available pet
foods is that this food:
Contains ingredients, chemicals, toxins, and poisons that should
not be consumed.
Lacks ingredients that should be part of our pet’s daily food
diet.
Package labeling is a necessary obligation the food manufacturers
are required to provide by law. These laws however, perpetuate a classification
system that has little to do with nutritional value. Manufacturers can
and do use obscure and easily misunderstood terms. Why are these labels
so obscure? The first and most important question to ask, for a better indication
of the nutritional value of food we buy, is what percent of the food is digestible.
A substance is a nutrient only when it is digestible, that is, absorbed
and assimilated by an animal consuming the food product. Unassimilated
food ingredients are at best, non-digestible roughage, and, at worst,
deadly toxins or poisons. Nowhere on the pet food label does it state how
much of the food can be digested. It is a fact that animals on “supermarket”
or convenience diets are usually chronically malnourished due to excessive
use of fillers, stale food, and chemicals coming out of a food can or pouch.
This empty nutrition, non-vital state of health is the fertile ground for
sub-standard biological activity and receptivity.
Pet and baby foods are unlike any other products sold in a supermarket.
Both items claim to be a complete, “Whole” nutritional package for the
consumer; all other foods in the supermarket are part of an overall, individually
tailored diet. Deficiencies in one food product are balanced by another
food product if variety and wholesomeness is valued. The possibility of
choosing what one wants to eat is available to humans. Our pets however,
are denied this choice when given only commercial pet food as the sole source
of nutrition. A pet owner must be satisfied in the belief the pet food is
all the animal really needs to insure minimum nutritional needs. Rarely can
one find a pet diet that provides more than minimum daily nutritional requirements;
that seeks to provide, in fact, greater Wellness. It would be wise to seek
out commercial pet foods that are, at best, acceptable supplements to a more
natural, raw meat diet.
The average pet owner feels satisfied upon leaving the store with
a large bag of pet food purchased at a very affordable price (food at 15
cents a pound). At home, the pet “attacks” the food in it’s food bowl further
confirming its owner’s conviction that a “smart” purchase in both value
and quality has been made. The pet loves the food! It eats it immediately
with great vigor. This “gusto” though is usually a sign of a pet’s lack
of proper nutrition. It is the voracious overeating observed everyday
at feeding time that indicates a lack in balanced nutrition along with
a hyperactivity usually unnoticed until the animal is put on a more nutritious
and wholesome diet. Overeating quickly empties a food bag; non-nutrient
fillers and appetite stimulants (addictive agents such as sucrose, corn
syrup, salt, and artificial flavoring) exacerbate a pet’s already undernourished
state. When a pet overeats a food of low nutritional value, they must “digest”
additional calories, protein, carbohydrates, and waste products to derive
a minimal benefit from the diet. Already low “vital energy” stores are
further depleted. This borderline state of starvation, despite regular
feedings, produces a responsive, though non-alert, living, though non-vital,
animal. The end result a pet owner or pet professional observes is an overweight,
doughy, dull-coated, undernourished pet that is marginally poisoned. This
is the main reason life expectancies of our pets are growing shorter every
year. Our companion animals just survive on convenience pet foods. From
a holistic perspective, mere survival is not enough; organisms need to
do more than just survive. By achieving a state of Wellness, a transcendent
growth is secured.
email Pet Nutritionist:
darleen@purelypets.com
with questions about your pet or our products.
Copyright © 1997~2007 Purely Pets. All rights reserved.
reprinted with kind permission from Darleen Rudnick
****************************
back to top
|
Additives in Pet Foods
BHA and BHT (Butylated Hydroxyanisole, Butylated Hydroxytoluene)
by Darleen Rudnick, Pet Nutritionist
(and other sources)
|
Testing of rats showed that
BHA and BHT inhibited growth, caused weight loss, damaged the liver, kidneys
and testicles, caused the rat to go bald, and elevated the blood cholesterol
levels. It also caused their offspring to be born without eyes, and there
were indications of brain defects. These two related preservatives are further
suspected of causing cancer and allergic reactions.
In addition, studies have revealed that BHT accumulates in human fat
tissue at a far greater concentration than it does in the fatty tissue
of rats. The sudden loss of body fat due to dieting, and illness, can result
in the releasing of this substance in toxic amounts. It may interest you
to know that the test animal in an Australian study (which suffered similar
effects as the above) were fed levels of 0.1% of BHA and BHT and that would
correspond to or be lower than, levels permitted by the Canadian Government
in some products.
For example, in Canada, in essential oils, citrus oil flavors and
dry flavors manufacturers are permitted to use levels up to 0.125% (higher
than the levels fed to the rats). In citrus oils, levels are permitted
up to 0.5% (Canadian Food and Drugs Act. Table XI. Part IV.)
BHA and BHT have also been proven to contribute to hyperactivity in
some children. Experiments at Concordia University in Montreal on pregnant
mice revealed that their offspring had abnormal brains and abnormal behavior
patterns. The behavioral changes were: increased exploration, sleeplessness,
poor grooming habits, decreased reflexes, aggression and severe learning
problems. Dr. Bernard Weiss, of the University of Rochester's School of Medicine,
is especially concerned with the behavioral problems cited by numerous
other research projects. He feels that government should test additives
not only for physical damage, but also for behavioral effects.
BHA and BHT can be used in:
Fats, oils, lard, mono-and diglycerides, shortening
Dried breakfast cereals
Dehydrated potato products (chips, etc.)
Chewing gum essential oils
Citrus oil flavors and dry flavors
Partially de-fatted pork and beef fatty tissue
Vitamin A liquids for addition to food
Margarine
Dry vitamin D preparations for addition to foods and certain
non-standardized foods as preservatives.
Consumers can be misled by the term "BHA or BHT in packaging only"
or box tops, as they may not realize that the chemicals do migrate onto
the food itself. Since many food producers do not use the additives and
still produce a good tasting, nutritious and economical product, it is clear
that BHA and BHT are nonessential and do not benefit the consumer.
The consumer would be wise to buy an alternative product and refrain
from purchasing any foods which contain these additives. The government
has been remiss in not demanding lifetime studies on a variety of species
on this and many other potentially toxic chemicals. BHT has been banned
for use in food in England, Romania, Sweden and Australia. In our opinion,
additives which are banned in one or more countries due to adverse test results
should automatically be banned in everywhere.
email Pet Nutritionist:
darleen@purelypets.com with questions
about your pet or our products.
Copyright © 1997~2007 Purely Pets. All rights reserved
reprinted with kind permission from Darleen Rudnick
back to top
**********************.
Dog Food Comparison
Written by Lori Matthews
Sunday, 15 July 2007
If you have a
dog or a cat, there's a good chance that you're still a bit shaken up
by the pet food recall that happened recently. You may even be wondering
if your new pet food is healthy. People lost their beloved animals to something
that shouldn't have done them any harm, and those of us lucky to be spared
this are taking a closer look at what we're feeding our dogs. By getting
a better idea of what needs to go into our pets' food, we can make better
decisions about their nutrition and diet.
Many people became confused as to what exactly was in their pets' food
that shouldn't be. It sad that some of us learned tainted ingredients
were included in pet foods to make the protein content seem higher.
Chemicals and other synthetic ingredients do not belong in dog and
cat food. Inferior ingredients like by - products, soy, wheat, gluten
and corn should not be used as a protein source or be included in the
food. These ingredients are often very hard on the pets' digestive system
and therefore do nothing nutritionally for them.
Some pet food companies will use very cheap ingredients to make
their food.
Diets require fiber, natural fats, carbohydrates and high-quality protein
- that is made from quality meat fit for human consumption. A healthy
mix is essential towards making sure that your dog neither becomes deficient
in nutrients, nor becomes obese, and by keeping a close eye on what your
dog is eating, you can make sure that some very basic issues are weeded
out before they become a problem. Often times we think the food we give
them isn't that bad. Unfortunately, pet food that has little nutritional
value will add up after time in the form of your animals' health. Just as
humans they need healthy nutritious balance of foods to keep their immune
system running at peak performance.
Food is one of the first considerations for having a healthy dog and
the more you know, the healthier your dog will be! The first 5 ingredients
are very important to the nutritional value of the food. Pet foods that
list 2 or more grains in the first 5 ingredients may have more vegetable
protein than animal protein. To learn more about healthy ingredients and
how to compare your dog and or cat food, please visit the site below.
The Myth
of 100% Complete Pet Food
Written by Dr. Randy Wysong
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
Every day, people by the millions
pour food from a package into their pet's bowl. Day in and day out, meal
after meal, pets get the same fare. This strange phenomenon is widely practiced
by loving pet owners who believe they are doing the right thing.
Why? Certainly because it is convenient, but also because the labels
state that such foods are "complete and balanced," "100% complete," or that
they have passed various analytical and feeding test standards. Furthermore,
manufacturers, and even veterinarians, counsel pet owners about not feeding
other foods, such as table scraps, because of the danger of unbalancing these
modern processed nutritional marvels. The power of the message is so great
that pet owners en masse do every day to their pets what they would never
do to themselves or their children - force-feed the same processed food
at every meal.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/premium_food.jpg
Think about it. Our world is complex beyond comprehension. It is not
only largely unknown, it is unknowable in the "complete" sense. In order
for nutritionists and manufacturers to produce a "100% complete and balanced"
pet food, they must first know 100% about nutrition. However, nutrition is
not a completed science. It is, in fact, an aggregate science, which is
based upon other sciences, such as chemistry, physics, and biology. But since
no scientist would argue that everything is known in chemistry, or physics,
or biology, how can nutritionists claim to know everything there is to know
about nutrition, which is based upon these sciences? This is the logical
absurdity of the "100% complete and balanced" diet claim. It is the reason
a similar venture to feed babies a "100% complete" formula turned out to
be a health disaster.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/nutrition_pillars.jpg
In that instance, after sufficient disease and death resulted from attempting
to retire the human breast to a mere appendage of adornment, government
stepped in and controlled the commercial hype. Now doctors, nurses and purveyors
of baby formulas cannot say these products are complete or that they are
equal to or superior to breast-feeding. Good for the regulators. (Although
they should have been proactive and prevented the disaster before it ever
took root, not have merely stepped in after enough deaths accrued.)
Even with that lesson as a dire warning, pet food regulators turn a
blind eye. Instead of preventing pet food producers from claiming a processed
food concoction is 100% complete, they in effect promote the death and disease-dealing
specious claim by setting bogus standards that supposedly justify and authenticate
the claim. They legitimize sloppy science in order to win consumer confidence.
All a manufacturer has to do is guarantee that their percentage of protein,
fat and the like meets National Research Council standards. In the alternative,
manufacturers can do feeding trials on caged laboratory animals for a few
weeks, measure cursory blood parameters, and monitor growth and weight -
as if survival after a few weeks on a food has anything to do with achieving
optimal health and long life!
Down the primrose path millions of trusting pet owners go while at the
same time unknowingly condemning their pets to terrible degenerative diseases.
Pet food regulators then spend the majority of their time harassing pet
food companies with picayune requirements about terminology on packaging
and where certain words must be placed on labels. In this regard manufacturers
must contend with the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), FDA
(Food and Drug Administration), AAFCO (American Association of Feed Control
Officials), and 50 State feed regulatory agencies. All for naught. It's
like the entire police force busying themselves ticketing people for jaywalking
while turning a blind eye to the murder and rape going on in the alleys.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/regulatory.jpg
Claiming that anything is 100% is like claiming perfection, total knowledge,
and absolute truth. Has pet nutrition really advanced that far? Does a chemist
make such a claim? A physicist? Doctor? Professor? Did Einstein, Bohr,
Pasteur, Aristotle, Plato, or any of the greatest minds in human history
make such claims? No. Has the science of pet nutrition advanced to the
point where everything is known about the physiology, digestion and biochemistry
of animals, or that everything is known about their food? Certainly not.
The fact of the matter is that the "100% complete" claim is actually
"100% complete" guesswork. At best, one could say that such a claim is the
firm possibility of a definite maybe.
Each time regulatory agencies convene to decide how much of which nutrients
comprise "100% completeness," debate always ensues and standards usually
change. This not only proves that what they claimed before was not "100%
complete," but this should also make us highly suspicious about what they
now claim to be "100% complete."
Moreover, consider that in order to determine the minimum requirement
for a certain nutrient - say protein - all other nutrients used in the
feeding trials must be adequate and standardized. Otherwise, if vitamin
E, for example, is in excess or is deficient in the basal diet, how would
one know if the results of the study were because of the effects of protein
or due to something amiss with the level of vitamin E?
If the minimum requirements for all 26+ essential nutrients were all
set and absolutely etched in stone, that would be one thing. But they aren't.
They are constantly changing. This means each time any nutrient requirement
is changed, all test results for all other nutrients using the wrong minimum
for this nutrient would then be invalid. Most nutritionists simply ignore
this conundrum, feeling like cowboys trying to lasso an octopus - there
are just too many loose ends. But they continue to perpetuate the "100% complete"
myth, and excuse themselves by saying they make adjustments when necessary.
An apology of "I'm sorry," when the false premise of "100% completeness"
is still retained, deserves no forgiveness.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/new_wave.jpg
Also consider that virtually all so-called complete pet foods are vigorously
heat processed to gelatinize the unnatural starch components (making them
"digestible" - meaning more easily converted to glucose) and to extend shelf-life
by sterilization. Dry foods are extruded at hundreds of degrees and hundreds
of pounds of pressure. Canned foods are retorted. Commercial pet foods
also contain a mix of ingredients including meats, fats, starches (a variety
of label dressing "natural" ingredient buzzwords) and vitamin/mineral "fortifiers."
Although the ingredient label is evocative and beguiling, what is in the
final product is another matter. Essential fatty acids are oxidized and
isomerized. Cytotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic cholesterol oxidation
products (COP) are formed, including C-7 derivatives, 5,6-epoxides, triols,
25-OHs and 3,5-dienes - the real culprits in human atherogenesis, incidently.
The cooked meats form heterocyclic amines, proteins are degraded and amino
acids destroyed or racemized. Carbohydrates are glycated, acrylamides are
formed, vitamins destroyed, oxidized and racemized and minerals are complexed
into unavailable matrices. The end result is a potpourri of imbalance, unavailability
and toxicity - not "100% completeness."
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/farmers_field2.jpg
Yes, pets can survive for a time on such fare, but that is simply a
testament to their physiological capacity to adapt. They seek equilibrium
at higher and higher levels of toxicity until adaptive reserve is exhausted.
Chronic degenerative diseases and immune failure is the end result.
The point is, don't believe the claim on any commercially prepared pet
(or human) food that it is "100% complete and balanced." It is a spurious
unsupported boast, intended to build consumer trust and dependence on commercial
products - not create optimal health.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/veterinarian_and_pediatrician.jpg
Unfortunately, most people think animal feeding is a mystery. It is
not. Animal nutrition is not a special nutritional science to which common
sense human nutrition principles cannot be applied. Use the same reasoning
in feeding your pets that you use for feeding your family. Nutrition is
also not about some special ingredient, the absence of some boogeyman ingredient,
or claims such as "natural," "organic," or the like.
http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/package.jpg
If you feed processed foods, use discernment since just about anyone
can create a commercial pet food. The pet food industry has hundreds of
brands. Business profiteers and the occasional movie star are the most common
forces behind the labels. All one needs is a little money and they can
go to any number of toll manufacturers and have them slightly modify a
shelf formula. Then all that is needed is to dress it all up with a fancy
package, a clever brochure, and some advertising. Voila! Another brand is
added to the 20-billion-dollar pet food industry heyday. http://www.wysong.net/images/myth/one_for_all.jpg
Nutrition is a serious health business, not a mere opportunity to turn
dollars. Check the credentials of the decision maker at the head of the
company you are entrusting your pet's health to and examine closely its operating
philosophy. Health competence and principle should come before pretty packaging
and beguiling hoopla. The public is not well served by exclusively feeding
products from companies without any real commitment to health... or knowledge
of how to even achieve it.
For the past 25 years, I have been a lonely voice in the wilderness
trying to get people to understand the deadly health consequences of feeding
processed pet foods exclusively. People want convenience in a bag and the
industry wants the flow of billions of dollars to continue uninterrupted.
In the meantime, the scientific literature offers compelling proof that
millions of animals have been maimed and killed as a result of feeding
thoroughly tested "100% complete" foods... with the full imprimatur of
government regulation. (Exactly the same thing that abounds in the FDA-pharmaceutical
industry.)
Examples of pet food disasters include dilated cardiomyopathy from taurine
deficiency, potassium imbalances, fatty acid and carnitine deficiencies
and numerous other problems that would be expected on a steady diet of dead,
devitalized, carbohydrate-based processed foods. Moreover, the whole panoply
of human chronic degenerative diseases such as cancer, obesity, arthritis,
autoimmunities, dental deterioration and organ failure are at epidemic levels
in the pet population... as should be expected on such a diet.
"Thousands of pet cats die each year with dilated cardiomyopathy...
observed in... cats fed commercial cat food..." (Science, Volume 237, pages
764-8)
Not only is feeding the same processed food day in and day out a formula
for disease, it is a cruelty to pets. It is one thing to take them from
their interesting and active wild setting and confine them, but to not even
offer them interesting natural meal variety is really quite inexcusable.
The answer, like everything else good in life, is a little attention and
common sense. Knowledge is the best beginning point.
Further reading and resources of scientific references:
Wysong, R. L. (2002). The Truth About Pet Foods. Midland, MI: Inquiry
Press. Science, Volume 237, pages 764-8
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 199,
pages 731-4
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 201,
pages 267-74Feline Practice, Volume 20, Number 1, page 30
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 202,
pages 744-51
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 191,
pages 1563-8 Journal of Nutrition, Volume 129, pages 1909-14
Journal of Nutrition, Volume 126, pages 984-8 Journal of the American
Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 203, pages 1395-1400
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Volume 198,
pages 647-50 Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice,
Volume 19, pages 527-37 Veterinary Forum, Volume 9, pages 34-5 Veterinary
Forum, Volume 9, pages 26-8 American Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume
62, pages 1616-23 Petfood Industry, May/June 1998, pages 4-14 Journal of
Animal Science, Volume 75, pages 2980-5 Veterinary Business, Volume 2, page
1
Waltham International Focus, Volume 3, Number 1, page 9
For further reading, or for more information about, Dr Wysong and the
Wysong Corporation please visit www.wysong.net
or write to wysong@wysong.net
For resources on healthier foods for people including snacks, and breakfast
cereals please visit www.cerealwysong.com.
Article Source:http://www.ArticleBlast.com
About The Author:Dr. Wysong is a former veterinary clinician and surgeon,
college instructor in human anatomy, physiology and the origin of life,
inventor of numerous medical, surgical, nutritional, athletic and fitness
products and devices, research director for the present company by his name
and founder of the philanthropic Wysong Institute. He is author of
The Creation-Evolution Controversy now in its twentieth printing, a new two
volume set on philosophy for living entitled Thinking Matters: 1-Living
Life... As If Thinking Matters; 2-The Big Questions...As If Thinking Matters,
several books on nutrition, prevention and health for people and animals
and over 18 years of monthly health newsletters. He may be contacted at
Wysong@Wysong.net and a free subscription
to his e-Health Letter is available at http://www.wysong.net. Also check out
http://www.cerealwysong.com
**********************************
back to top
"Ahimsa" is a Hindi word meaning 'Kindness to all life.'
Choosing the right food for
your dog is important, with both short and long-term consequences. Your
dog’s health depends on you and the nutrition you provide; get familiar with
the ingredients in pet food. Many veterinarians have come to believe that
the best foods for a dog are those that are closest to his ancestral diet:
raw meat, in all different cuts and varieties, and a sprinkling of herbal
or vegetable matter. But for many of us, providing that kind of diet is inconvenient
and expensive. For those of us who have gotten used to the ease of feeding
dried fog food out of a bag, this can help you become an informed consumer.
FOODS SHOULD CONTAIN:
Superior sources of protein. This means either whole, fresh meats or
single-source meat meal (for example, chicken meal rather than poultry meal).
A whole meat source as one of the first two ingredients (chicken) or
chicken meal, for instance). A meat source in two of the top three ingredients
also helps indicate the food is high in meat. Ingredients are always listed
in descending order of weight, i.e. the ingredient responsible for the greatest
amount of weight in the bag is listed first. If a label reads, “beef, ground
yellow corn, rice, corn gluten meal,” it appears that there is more beef
than anything else in the sack, but the total weight of the ground yellow
corn plus corn gluten meal may outweigh the beef.
Whole unprocessed grains, vegetables, and other foods. Whole unprocessed
grains, vegetables, and other foods have a great chance of having its nutrients
and enzymes intact.
Look for foods that have whole meat (listed simply as lamb, chicken,
beef, etc.) in the top three ingredients. Look for whole foods like rice,
wheat, eggs, and foods that are kept fresh with natural preservatives like
vitamin C and E (often listed as mixed-tocopherols).
Meat is the most important and natural source of protein for canines.
The only exception might be for dogs that have been proven to be allergic
to all meat proteins. Pets need enzymes essential for every biochemical
bodily function, vitamin C is critically important, vitamin E is an antioxidant
needed to detoxify.
No matter what the commercials say, dog food does not contain “all the
nutrients your dog will ever need.” Don’t buy any pet food that contains
“meat” meal, “meat & poultry by-products," bone meal, animal fat, or
tallow.
FOODS SHOULD NOT CONTAIN:
Meat by-products. These “second-class” products are not handled as carefully
as whole meat. Meat by-products - the non-rendered, clean parts, other than
meat, derived from slaughtered mammals. It includes, but is not limited
to, lungs, spleen, kidneys, brain, livers, blood, bone, partially defatted
low temperature fatty tissue, and stomachs and intestines.
Poultry by-products - must consist of non-rendered clean parts of carcasses
of slaughtered poultry such as heads, feet, viscera.
Poultry by-products meal - Poultry by product meal consists of the ground,
rendered clean parts of the carcass of slaughtered poultry, such as necks,
feet, undeveloped eggs, and intestines, exclusive of feathers, except in
such amounts as may occur unavoidably in good processing practices.
Animal by-products meal - the rendered product from mammal tissues,
exclusive of any added hair, hoof, horn, hide trimmings, manure, stomach
and rumen contents...This ingredient definition is intended to cover those
individual rendered animal tissue products that cannot meet the criteria
as set forth elsewhere in this section.
Fats or proteins named generically - for example, animal fat, poultry
fat or meat meal as opposed to the better quality beef fat, chicken fat
or lamb meal. The generic term indicates that the ingredient is actually
a mixed bag of ingredients, coming from a number of sources.
Food fragments - brewer’s rice, corn gluten, etc., this item is the
least odious on this list. Most foods contain at least one fragment, as
makers economize where it least hurts the food.
Artificial preservatives are used to prevent food from turning rancid.
These include BHA, BHT, (especially) ethoxyquin, potassium sorbate, sodium
nitrate, these are known to cause liver and kidney dysfunction.
Artificial colors, Sweeteners - added to attract dogs to unappealing
food; Propylene glycol-( a first cousin to anti freeze), toxic when consumed
in large amounts; causes the fatal destruction of red blood cells. This
is added to some “chewy” foods to keep them moist.
Recommended Reading:
NEW EDITION
Food Pets Die for: Shocking Facts About Pet Food
By Ann N. Martin, foreword by Shawn Messonnier, DVM
Dr. Pitcairn's Complete Guide to Natural Health for Dogs &
Cats
By Richard H. Pitcairn, D.V.M., Ph.D. & Susan
Hubble Pitcairn
Give Your Dog a Bone:
The Practical Commonsense Way to Feed Dogs
By Dr Ian Billinghurst, B.V.SC, B.Sc.Agr., Dip. Ed.
Copyright © Ahimsa Rescue Foundation
2003 - 2007 No reprints or copies without expressed, written permission
reprinted with kind permission from Teresa L. Morton, Ahimsa
Rescue Founder
The above information is simply informational.
It's intent is not to replace the advice of a veterinarian nor to assist you
in making a diagnosis of your pet. Please consult with your own veterinarian
for confirmation of any diagnosis. Your pets life may depend on it.